HomePoliticsBombshell Announcement – SCOTUS Case Could Flip 2020, Boot Biden And Harris

Bombshell Announcement – SCOTUS Case Could Flip 2020, Boot Biden And Harris

Published on

When the 2020 presidential election unexpectedly swung toward the Democrats and Joe Biden was elected president instead of Donald Trump, there was a great uproar in the United States. Not only were all efforts by President Trump and Republicans to call for recounts and address obvious problems in numerous states with voting procedures thwarted, but the new Democrat administration even attempted to blame President Trump for the legitimate protests in Washington, D.C. over the election results.

While the media has emphasized the attacks against Trump in relation to the 2016 election, there have been events that have not been reported by the media, and a lawsuit is proceeding in secret regarding those events in 2020 and the actions since that are in direct opposition to the U.S. Constitution.

Western Journal reports that the plaintiff/appellant, Raland Brunson of Ogden, Utah, and his three brothers seek nothing less than the removal of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris from office on the grounds that members of Congress failed to fulfill their constitutional duty on January 6, 2021 by failing to investigate allegations of fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

Former Arkansas governor and Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee just released an article highlighting the upcoming hearing of Brunson v. Adams before the U.S. Supreme Court this week. Huckabee wrote, “Sit down; I guarantee this Supreme Court story is real.”

“The Supreme Court has agreed to a hearing for a case that could conceivably — PLEASE consider this the longest of long shots — overturn the election of 2020, throw out all the legislators who voted to certify the results and leave them ineligible to run for office ever again, even for town dogcatcher,” he explained. The case is set for oral argument on Friday, Jan. 6, the second anniversary of the Capitol incursion.

In their complaint, the Brunson brothers argue that 388 politicians identified in their court filing swore to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution “against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Yet, they “purposely thwarted all efforts to investigate [allegations of fraud in the 2020 election], whereupon this enemy was not checked or investigated, therefore the Respondents adhered to this enemy.”

In their appeal to the Supreme Court, the Brunsons stated, “On January 6, 2021, the 117th Congress held a proceeding and debate in Washington DC (“Proceeding”). This Proceeding was for the purpose of counting votes under the 2020 Presidential election for the President and Vice President of the United States under Amendment XII.”

“During this Proceeding over 100 members of U.S. Congress claimed factual evidence that the said election was rigged. The refusal of the Respondents to investigate this congressional claim (the enemy) is an act of treason and fraud by Respondents,” the brothers continued. “A successfully rigged election has the same end result as an act of war; to place into power whom the victor wants, which in this case is Biden, who, if not stopped immediately, will continue to destroy the fundamental freedoms of Brunson and all U.S. Citizens and courts of law.”

Western Journal says that the Brunsons are attacking the process itself that occurred during the certification of the election on January 6, 2021, rather than attempting to establish the election was manipulated or stolen.

Huckabee noted: “The argument in this case is that by not looking into serious allegations of election fraud, those who voted to confirm the results of the 2020 election broke their oath of office and are ineligible to run for any elected office again. To give you an idea of the scope of the potential fallout, Kamala Harris is in that group, and so is Mike Pence.”

More on this story via The Republic Brief:

In a commentary piece last month, Tim Canova — a constitutional law scholar and professor at Nova Southeastern University’s Shepard Broad College of Law in Florida — offered his assessment as to why the Supreme Court took up the case, which had been dismissed at the federal district court level in February without going to trial. CONTINUE READING…

Latest articles

Judge Has Had Enough of Hunter Biden’s Games, Threatens Him with Up to 6 Months in Prison

Hunter Biden has been ordered to appear in person in an Arkansas court next...

Skilled Pilot of Ill-Fated GOP Donor’s Family Plane Had 2-Word Nickname Because He Was So Good

The pilot of the private aircraft that crashed in Virginia on Sunday had a...

FBI caves, will let Comer’s full committee see Biden bribery document

US Rep. James Comer (R-KY), chairman of the US House Oversight Committee, has forced...

Pence Throws MAGA Patriots and Trump Under The Bus At CNN Town Hall

Former vice president Mike Pence spoke to Republican electors in Des Moines, Iowa, during...

More like this