When the Supreme Court declared 6-3 that New York’s concealed carry legislation was unconstitutional, it was one of the most significant Second Amendment triumphs in over two decades.

According to experts, the verdict indicates that similarly stringent concealed carry regulations, which are predominantly prevalent in blue states, would likely be challenged in court with the same outcome.

“This decision is a big deal,” FiveThirtyEight announced following the decision. “Previously, the court had only said that the Constitution protected the ability to have a gun inside the home for self-defense. In that decision, which came down in 2008, the justices didn’t rule on how guns carried outside the home could be regulated. It took almost 15 years for the justices to come back to that question, but now they have.”

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in his majority opinion stating that the Second Amendment “protect[s] an individual’s right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home,” hence statutes such as the one in New York, “which required people who wanted a license to carry a concealed handgun in public to show they have a good reason, are no longer allowed,” FiveThirtyEight added.

Today, Senate Republicans are proposing legislation to codify the momentous Supreme Court rule on self-defense from 2022.

“The legislation, backed by all GOP members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, would codify the high court’s ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen. The 6-3 decision, issued last June, was authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, who said New York’s gun-licensing requirement that a person must show proper need to carry a firearm ran afoul of the Second Amendment right to self-defense,” according to the Washington Times.

To safeguard future Supreme Court rulings, Senate Republicans wish to codify the decision.

“We have a Bill of Rights and it is not an a la carte menu. Every right as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court matters,” Louisiana Republican Sen. John Kennedy said.

“With this bill, we are ensuring that the rights affirmed by the Supreme Court are part of the federal code — and preventing a future Supreme Court from reversing this decision. The Respect for the Second Amendment Act will memorialize the holdings in these landmark Supreme Court cases and provide further protection to the Second Amendment,” South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham declared.

“In February, a federal appeals court struck down a measure banning the possession of a firearm by anyone under a court order for domestic violence, such as stalking, harassing, or threatening an intimate partner,” reported Conservative Brief.

“I can’t square that decision with the actual danger that women and police officers face from armed domestic abusers, and I don’t believe the founders of our nation would want courts to ignore this danger when applying the Constitution they wrote,” said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Richard J. Durbin, Illinois Democrat, on Wednesday.

“The chaos the Bruen decision has caused is predictable,” he added.

In addition, the judges returned to an appeals court a Maryland lawsuit that challenged the state’s prohibition on 45 types of so-called “assault” weapons. In 2017, the Supreme Court rejected an earlier appeal to this statute.

More on this story via The Republic Brief:

“Thomas’s opinion states regulations need to be historically consistent with the Second Amendment,” according to FiveThirtyEight. CONTINUE READING…