HomePoliticsDid the DOJ Try to Bribe Trump Aide's Lawyer to Cooperate with...

Did the DOJ Try to Bribe Trump Aide’s Lawyer to Cooperate with Prosecutors Against 45?

Published on

In exchange for favorable consideration of his job application for a judgeship in Washington, D.C., a senior Department of Justice official allegedly pressured the counsel of a former presidential aide to compel his client to testify against Trump.

The astonishing allegation was first reported by the U.K.’s Guardian on June 8, citing “three people familiar with the matter.”

In a court filing, Stanley Woodward, the attorney for Trump’s co-defendant and adviser, Walt Nauta, allegedly made the allegation against Jay Bratt, the prosecutor in charge of the federal case against the former president.

Bratt is the director of the counterintelligence division at the Department of Justice.

After the 45th president departed office, Nauta, who had served as Trump’s military attendant during his presidency, retired from the Navy to become his personal assistant.

Will Scharf, a former U.S. attorney, retweeted the Guardian’s article and added his thoughts in an extensive Twitter thread in which he called the federal case against Trump “outrageous and shocking.”

“Far and away the most troubling side story to emerge from this saga so far are the allegations made by Trump aide and co-defendant Walt Nauta’s lawyer last week,” Scharf tweeted. “You may have missed it if you blinked. Not surprisingly, the mainstream media has mostly buried this one.”

He continued: “Nauta’s lawyer, Stanley Woodward, alleged in a court filing that during a meeting with prosecutors about his client’s case, the head of the Counterintelligence Section of DOJ’s National Security Division Jay Bratt “suggested Woodward’s judicial application [for a D.C. Superior Court judgeship] might be considered more favorably if he and his client cooperated against Trump.”

Scharf remarked: “If true, and I find it hard to believe that Woodward just made the whole thing up, this is wild misconduct. Truly wild. It could undermine the entire case against both Trump and Nauta. It could end careers at DOJ if fairly investigated.”

Scharf implied that the alleged November 2022 coercive inducement was essentially a bribe: a possible judgeship in exchange for detrimental testimony against Trump.

Scharf stated that he does not know Woodward personally, but is aware of his formidable reputation as an attorney.

“He is a highly accomplished lawyer. Spent a decade at Akin Gump, a top law firm, clerked on the DC Circuit, and has very substantial experience in government investigations,” the former federal prosecutor tweeted.

“This is not some fly by night TV lawyer. He’s a real deal legal heavyweight, and he’s leveling an extremely serious allegation of misconduct against a senior official at DOJ.”

More on this story via The Western Journal:

According to The Guardian, Woodward made the bombshell allegations last week in a sealed letter to James Boasberg, the chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. CONTINUE READING…

Latest articles

Alarming Investigation Update – BAD News For Joe Biden

According to sources consulted by ABC News, an investigation has been launched to examine...

Judge Rules Against Trump, Claims He Committed Fraud for Years While Building Real Estate Empire

A judge ruled that Donald Trump committed fraud while developing his real estate empire,...

Hillary Clinton Issues Damning Warning To Joe Biden In Private Meeting

Hillary Clinton advised President Joe Biden, in a private conversation, to consider the potential...

Disgust Over What Michelle Obama Just Got Paid $700K To Do…

Former First Lady Michelle Obama, who frequently portrays herself as a figure facing adversity,...

More like this