Mark Levin, a constitutional attorney and commentator, criticized the continued persecuting of former president Donald Trump vehemently and personally criticized the case’s handling on Fox News.
During Thursday and Friday appearances on the network, Levin emphasized the role of political prejudice, abuse of the legal system, and an unprecedented attack on a former president.
Yesterday, he began his remarks by emphasizing the potential gravity of the ramifications confronting Trump. He claimed the indictment was the result of “bandits in the White House by the Democrat Party who don’t play fair anymore,” calling it a “disgusting mark on the future of American history.”
According to Levin, the current administration uses the Department of Justice and the FBI to further their political agenda, and Attorney General Merrick Garland is a “mob lawyer.” He asserted that the Democratic Party desired a one-party dictatorship and was employing legal means to achieve this goal.
According to Levin, the Presidential Records Act, the statute under which Trump is allegedly being prosecuted, was never intended to be a criminal statute. This assertion was made by Levin when he suggested that a violation of the law may be at play in the Trump case.
“What did he do with the documents? Did he sell them to the enemy? No! That’s why we have an Espionage Act, not the trick of a president. What did he do? Did he burn them all? No! The government has all the documents back.”
Then, on Friday, in another monologue on Martha MacCallum’s show, Levin ripped a huge hole in the case with one straightforward query: “Was anything destroyed?”
SEE IT HERE:
The allegations against Trump are based on a “document case,” in which the former president may serve a significant amount of time in prison for improper document retention. Levin questioned the logic of this, wondering if it was a sadistic prank on the American people.
Numerous individuals have criticized the use of legal technicalities in the prosecution of Trump. Levin concurred that the accusations made against the former president were, in essence, procedural crimes that were exacerbated by the politicization of the investigation.
“The idea that this man is not under a criminal investigation and that they criminalized that damn document case to go after Donald Trump is sickening.”
Additionally, the attorney questioned the prosecutor’s handling of the case and accused him of weakening the nation by enlarging the legislation. Levin stressed that Merrick Garland, the attorney general, took the decision to indict Trump, and he suggested that it was done with the intention of meddling in the election.
In his remarks, Levin expresses his grave concern over what he perceives to be a politically motivated and unfair attack on a former president, contending that it is indicative of a troubling trend in American politics and the legal system. In his final statement, he issued a call to action, urging citizens to reject the misinformation spread by the media and to see the ongoing “war on Trump” as an assault on the Republican Party and, consequently, the Republic itself.