SCOTUS Leaker Possibly Caught!

Every woke liberal was collectively outraged when the Supreme Court moved to reverse Roe V. Wade. Pro-abortion groups immediately had people in the streets. Demonically unhinged people became violent in places. Of course, everyone wanted to know who leaked the information.

Join Our Telegram Chanel Here: Donald Trump News

In all of US history, a leak from the inner chambers of the Supreme Court has never happened to such an extent. It wasn’t just a few notes about the case, but rather a complete legal opinion. This document was complete with the names of those Justices who were for and against the measure.

TRENDING: JUST IN: SCOTUS Leaker To Pay Huge Price After Announcement

According to ABC News, the situation is as follows:

“Certainly, it’s not a totally leakproof institution, but there has never been a leak even remotely like this,” said ABC News Supreme Court contributor Kate Shaw on ABC News’ podcast “Start Here.” “I don’t think in the history of the Supreme Court, which is the history of the country – it is totally uncharted.”

The importance of confidentiality ensures that justices are free to judge the truth based on the Constitution rather than fear of public opinion or outrage, as in this case.

In the draft opinion, the justices provide a ringing denunciation of the 1973 ruling that guaranteed the right to abortion under the federal constitution and a 1992 decision that effectively maintained it, Planned Parenthood v. Casey. “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” Alito wrote in the draft.

“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” he stated in the document, which is titled “Opinion of the Court.” “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”

Former National Press Secretary for Hillary Clinton’s failed 2016 presidential campaign Brian Fallon praised a potential “brave clerk” who may have leaked what appears to be a preliminary ruling by Justice Samuel Alito overturning Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. It took the “unpredecented [sic] step of leaking a draft opinion to warn the country what’s coming in a last-ditch Hail Mary attempt to see if the public response might cause the Court to reconsider.”

It is now time to track down the leaker. Here are the top suspects in this unfolding investigation, even though we don’t know their identities for sure.

First and foremost, it’s imperative to realize that there are differing opinions about where the leaker originates. Opinions vary between conservatives and liberals.

Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Patriots news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Even if it seems improbable, the theory that the document was leaked by someone on the right is gaining ground. We must look critically at the facts and speculations that point to a conservative being the leaker.

The first person in question has not been confirmed as the leaker, but the evidence does seem to point in her direction.

In the tweet above, the woman is Ginni Thomas. Her husband is Justice Clarence Thomas. You may remember the controversy she caused when her text messages regarding “stop the steal” became public.

Ginni’s company, Ginni & Co., also represents many conservatives who appear on the news weekly.

ABC notes that it may be a family member of one of the justices.

Mr. Epps said it is not out of the question that the justices might share their work with family members. (A common conspiracy theory on Twitter — offered with no evidence — is that Ginni Thomas, a conservative political activist and the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas, leaked the draft.)

The leak could have been a strategic move by someone in the pro-life movement. Release a copy of the draft that includes the names of the Justices that voted for it and those against it so that no one changes their minds later on.

What would it look like if a Justice changed sides after the fact? It wouldn’t be a good look.

Here’s Liz Wheeler speaking about this theory:

Despite growing in credibility, many people believe it was in fact Liberals who published this leak. I thought it wasn’t a coincidence that they all came to Twitter at the same time. There were similarities in the language and the calls to action.

View Bernie Sanders’ tweets, AOC’s tweets, and Senator Warren’s tweets:

We now turn our attention to possible leakers on the Left.

Amit Jain is allegedly a clerk for Associate Justice Sonia Maria Sotomayor. In a report on Sotomayer, Yale Law states that Jain attended the school in 2018.

Some have confused Jain with another person with the same name who lives in India and was the Managing Director of Sequoia Capital India.

The person in the above tweet is not the Amit Jain in question. It’s important to make sure we stick to facts and do our research.

Join Our Telegram Chanel Here: Donald Trump News

Next, we have another liberal who may have been the leaker.

Elizabeth is a possibility worth considering. She clerks for Justice Breyer. Her political leaning is to the left, and if one were to get creative, she could have gained access to the document. She has a Yale Law Journal article from 2015 as her greatest achievement.

Abortion and reproductive rights were the topics of the article. It also includes a criticism of Hobby Lobby.