HomePoliticsShocking Audio: Left-Wing Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Names Key Detail that May...

Shocking Audio: Left-Wing Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Names Key Detail that May Guarantee Trump’s Return to Colorado Ballot

Published on

Even a Supreme Court justice with left-leaning views has raised concerns about Colorado’s argument to disqualify former President Donald Trump from the state’s presidential ballot.

In an audio recording from within the Supreme Court, broadcast on C-SPAN and shared on the social media platform X, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson pointed out a significant flaw in Colorado’s claim that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment justifies Trump’s removal from the state’s presidential ballot.

Jackson highlighted a critical issue – the 14th Amendment’s third section does not explicitly mention the office of the president. The section primarily addresses disqualification from congressional offices, as well as presidential and vice-presidential electors, without expressly mentioning the presidency.

During her questioning of Jason Murray, the attorney representing the group seeking Trump’s disqualification, Jackson presented a compelling historical argument, expressed skepticism about Colorado’s interpretation of Section 3, and ultimately emphasized both original intent and judicial restraint.

Jackson inquired, “Can you speak to the argument that Section 3 was about preventing the South from rising again in the context of these local elections, as opposed to focusing on the presidency?”

Murray responded with a comment about states regulating ballot access, prompting Jackson to clarify that her query was specific to the presidency.

Despite Murray’s insistence that the framers intended to exclude “charismatic rebels” from all federal offices, Jackson raised a crucial point – the absence of the term “president” in the enumerated list in Section 3.

She expressed concern, stating, “The thing that really is troubling to me is, I totally understand your argument, but they were listing people that were barred, and ‘president’ is not there. And so, I guess that just makes me worry that maybe they weren’t focusing on the president.”

Jackson also highlighted that the amendment’s framers did list vice-presidential and presidential electors, suggesting a deliberate omission of the presidency was unlikely.

As Murray struggled, citing a contemporary exchange between Democratic Sen. Reverdy Johnson and Republican Sen. Justin S. Morrill, Jackson astutely pointed out the ambiguity in Morrill’s response.

She concluded by posing a critical question, “And so if there’s an ambiguity, why would we construe it to, as Justice Kavanaugh pointed out, uh, against democracy?”

In December, Colorado’s State Supreme Court ruled Trump ineligible for the presidency based on the Capitol incursion of Jan. 6, 2021. Notably, no court has convicted Trump of “insurrection.” Regardless of the Supreme Court’s ruling in this case, credit goes to Jackson for an honest evaluation of Section 3’s plain meaning.

Latest articles

Journalist Charged with Hacking Fox News and Leaking Tucker Carlson Footage

Journalist Timothy Burke faced indictment on Thursday, charged with offenses related to hacking in...

Trump Legal Team Unleashes Phone Records That Cast Major Doubt on Fani Willis and Nathan Wade’s Story

An examination of mobile phone records, presented by the legal team of former President...

Biden’s New Regulation Could Make Up to 1 Million Jobs Vanish

The Biden administration is in the process of putting in place a rule one...

Indicted FBI Informant Re-Arrested Under β€˜Bizarre Circumstances,’ His Lawyers Say

A longstanding FBI informant, accused of orchestrating a fabricated multi-million dollar bribery scheme involving...

More like this