Ted Cruz Reveals Major Developments in the Durham Probe

Ted Cruz, the Republican senator from Texas, said if Special Counsel John Durham’s recent legal filings are true, it would be worse than the Watergate scandal of Nixon’s era.

Join Our Telegram Chanel Here: Donald Trump News

According to the Texas Republican, the Clinton presidential campaign paid spies to conduct surveillance on President Trump during the 2016 campaign, a report that outraged viewers on “Fox News Sunday.”

The accused should be put in jail if the accusations are true, Cruz said.

Cruz told Fox, “We have to see what the facts are, the allegations, what he filed in federal court, is deeply concerning. What he alleged as a federal prosecutor, a special prosecutor, is that a lawyer for the Hillary Clinton campaign conspired with a big tech executive to monitor and spy on Donald Trump, to spy on him at his home, to spy on him at his office, and indeed they were spying on the White House itself. They were spying on a sitting president.”

“You and I both remember when President Trump said the Democrats are spying on me. The corporate media collectively laughed at him. They mocked him. They said what a ridiculous claim for him to make. Well, what special counsel Durham is alleging is true. What Donald Trump said was absolutely right. To the extent Hillary Clinton is complicit with this, her campaign is complicit with it, or lawyers are complicit with it, big tech is complicit with it. If this is true, it’s a lot bigger than Watergate. That was a bungled, third-rate burglary. It was wrong, people to jail for Watergate, and people need to go to jail for this if these allegations are true.”

As part of the campaign’s effort to create a “narrative” linking Trump to Russia, Durham claimed that Clinton campaign lawyers paid a tech company to ‘infiltrate’ the server belonging to Trump Tower and the Trump White House.

Court documents filed a little over a week ago revealed possible conflicts of interest associated with the representation of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussman, who has been accused of lying to the FBI.

Fox News broke the story first:

Durham filed a motion on Feb. 11 focused on potential conflicts of interest related to the representation of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussman, who has been charged with making a false statement to a federal agent. Sussman has pleaded not guilty.

The indictment against Sussman says he told then-FBI General Counsel James Baker in September 2016, less than two months before the 2016 presidential election, that he was not doing work “for any client” when he requested and held a meeting in which he presented “purported data and ‘white papers’ that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel” between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which has ties to the Kremlin.

Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Patriots news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

As Durham explained in his February 11 filing titled “Factual Background,” Sussman “had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign.”

There was a statement that Sussman’s billing records indicated that he “repeatedly billed the Clinton Campaign for his work on the Russian Bank-1 allegations.”

As part of the filing, the Tech Executive and Sussman met and discussed the matter with another law partner, who was working as a lawyer for the Clinton campaign. That lawyer has been identified as Marc Elias, a former partner at Perkins Coie.

Durham’s filing states that in July 2016, the tech executive worked with Sussman, a U.S. investigative firm retained by Law Firm 1 on behalf of the Clinton campaign, numerous cyber researchers, and employees at multiple internet companies to “assemble the purported data and white papers.”

“In connection with these efforts, Tech Executive-1 exploited his access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data,” read the filing. “Tech Executive-1 also enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract.”

“Tech Executive-1 tasked these researchers to mine Internet data to establish ‘an inference’ and ‘narrative’ tying then-candidate Trump to Russia,” Durham argued. “In doing so, Tech Executive-1 indicated that he was seeking to please certain ‘VIPs,’ referring to individuals at Law Firm-1 and the Clinton campaign.”

Trump claimed last Wednesday that Democrats spied on his White House as well as his New York City apartment.

He made the allegations in response to Durham’s court filing.

Some experts say that the internet data questioned has little value except in highly specialized circumstances.

However, Trump has continued to assert vindication for claims he made in 2017 that Barack Obama had spied on him.

‘Much of the now-uncovered espionage campaign of the Democrats breaking into the White House and my New York City apartment, took place after the 2016 election as yet another way to undermine the upcoming 2020 election,’ he said in an email on Wednesday evening in response to Hillary Clinton’s denial on her Twitter account.

Join Our Telegram Chanel Here: Donald Trump News

‘This spying into the Oval Office continued for a long period of time and further served to undermine and discredit the 2020 election, along with massive ballot harvesting, phantom voters, and so many other things that made the election a sham.

‘The voting numbers were big and determinative.’

Durham made a filing on Friday that suggested a Democratic lawyer is working to weave a tale about Trump colluding with Russia using information obtained from internet data at the Trump Tower apartment and the White House.