HomePoliticsTrump Judge Destroyed By Devastating News She Didn’t See Coming

Trump Judge Destroyed By Devastating News She Didn’t See Coming

Published on

Republicans have expressed significant apprehension regarding the weaponization of the Biden Department of Justice throughout Joe Biden’s presidency. The indictments levied against former President Trump provide no ambiguity regarding the anti-Trump and anti-Republican endeavors undertaken by the branch of the United States government that was designed to operate independently of partisan politics.

The persistent campaign against Trump and his allies over the course of several years has failed to diminish America’s eagerness for Trump to reclaim the White House, as his approval continues to rise in the surveys. On the contrary, as charges accumulate against Hunter Biden and his father, President Joe Biden, indictments have not materialized as of yet.

The American public is increasingly cognizant of the fact that the judges overseeing Trump’s cases exhibit political biases and incline significantly toward the Trump-hating camp.

Regarding the events of January 6, a prominent Republican is now leveling a significant accusation against the judge in Washington, D.C., who is supervising Trump’s trial there.

Fox News reports:

The No. 3 House Republican is calling for an ethics probe into a Washington, D.C., judge who has issued decisions in cases related to both former President Donald Trump and the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.

Without using Trump’s name, Howell blamed the violence at the Capitol on “big lies” and warned of “a very surprising and downright troubling moment in this country when the very importance of facts is dismissed, or ignored.”

The American Journal Daily reports on the matter:

Rep. Elise Stefanik is calling for an ethics probe against D.C. District Judge Beryl Howell over a speech she gave in late November. During the speech, she appeared to spread the Democrats’ narrative of January 6th.

While she refrained from explicitly mentioning Trump, she ascribed the occurrences of January 6th to “big lies,” an apparent allusion to the assertions that Trump made regarding the 2020 election. The judge has been accused by Representative Stefanik of predicting that Trump’s re-election would “lead to fascism in America.”

Americans ought to be concerned about the possibility that federal justices are biased. If this judge harbors a genuine bias against Trump, an impartial trial for him is improbable. In the past, prosecutors’ or juries’ decisions were overturned by judges who were possibly motivated by politics.

Representative Stefanik described the speech delivered by the judge as “highly inappropriate.” Others may conclude that Judge Howell is potentially biased. Congress might exert some influence over the judge to recuse herself from the case in response to this ethical complaint.

The judge’s November speech regarding the events of that day is manifestly biased. It has been reported that Howell supports harsher sentencing for defendants on trial for the January 6 actions at the Capitol. She has presided over grand jury proceedings pertaining to the case of Special Council Jack Smith against Trump and supervised the fruitless grand jury investigation into “Russiagate” by Robert Mueller.

Bloomberg Law reports:

Stefanik said the judge’s remarks were “hardly apolitical.”

“Judge Howell’s partisan speech is obviously highly inappropriate election interference by a federal judge that undermines the public’s trust in our courts,” wrote Stefanik, who is chair of the House Republican Committee.

Stefanik specifically claimed that Howell violated a section of the code of conduct for federal judges against lending “the prestige of the judicial office to advance the private interests of the judge or others, nor convey or permit others to convey the impression that they are in a special position to influence the judge.”

The Judicial Council of the DC Circuit, a body of judges charged with reviewing complaints against members of the DC federal trial and appellate courts, will evaluate Stefanik’s request.

In the past, Judge Howell has commented on the sentencing of participants from the January 6 protest, stating that certain defendants were given sentences commensurate with the behavior of the demonstrators, despite her conviction that the protest that day was orchestrated by malicious Trump supporters.

The Washington Post reported that Judge Howell said, “No wonder parts of the public in the U.S. are confused about whether what happened on Jan 6 at the Capitol was simply a petty offense of trespassing with some disorderliness, or shocking criminal conduct which represented a grave threat to our democratic norms.’

“Let me make my view clear: the rioters were not mere protesters,” Howell stated. “Probation should not be the norm.”

It appears that Howell is unabashed in expressing her view regarding the events of January 6 and the individuals involved. It remains to be seen whether the legal examiners will accord Stefanik’s complaint due consideration.

Five reasons why Stefanik is a prominent candidate to succeed Trump as vice president in 2024 were recently outlined in an article for The Hill.

Stefanik is advocating for Trump in his civil lawsuit in New York; she is a Trump supporter; she is 40 years old and possesses substantial political experience; she would not “overshadow” Trump but would be a viable candidate for the presidency in 2028; and she possesses the ability to articulate his audacious strategies for his re-election.

Latest articles

Journalist Charged with Hacking Fox News and Leaking Tucker Carlson Footage

Journalist Timothy Burke faced indictment on Thursday, charged with offenses related to hacking in...

Trump Legal Team Unleashes Phone Records That Cast Major Doubt on Fani Willis and Nathan Wade’s Story

An examination of mobile phone records, presented by the legal team of former President...

Biden’s New Regulation Could Make Up to 1 Million Jobs Vanish

The Biden administration is in the process of putting in place a rule one...

Indicted FBI Informant Re-Arrested Under ‘Bizarre Circumstances,’ His Lawyers Say

A longstanding FBI informant, accused of orchestrating a fabricated multi-million dollar bribery scheme involving...

More like this